Was this the greatest football match of all time?

Described by http://football-england.com

Division Two. Saturday December 21, 1957

Charlton Athletic vs Huddersfield Town att. 12,535

"Amazing, fantastic, incredible...call it what you will" exclaimed the newspaper report from this game as the dust settled on the most remarkable comeback in the history of English football.

There was nothing to suggest that a classic encounter was on the cards in the run up to this game.

Although Charlton were handily placed on the fringe of the second division promotion race there was little in the visit of mid table Huddersfield Town to inspire the locals on the Saturday before Christmas.

Vast swathes of the huge Valley terraces were almost deserted as a below average crowd huddled together in clutches to create atmosphere and warmth and there was no immediate sign of their team doing anything to brighten their days.

After a quiet opening where the visitors looked marginally more lively, the first incident of note occurred in the 17th minute.

Charlton's skipper and centre half, Derek Ufton, threw himself into a challenge and landed awkwardly on the heavy pitch. Ufton had dislocated his shoulder and had to be carted off, in agony, to hospital.

In 1957, at a time before substitutions, Ufton's injury reduced Charlton to 10 men, with over 70 minutes left to play.

Charlton had shown little to this point and, struggling to reshuffle after the loss of Ufton, Huddersfield assumed control.

On 27 minutes the inevitable occurred, The Terriers inside left Les Massie firing home from point blank range to take the side to a 1-0 lead.

Eight minutes later Alex Bain took advantage of the freedom he had been given since Ufton's injury to take the visitors to 2-0 up at the break.

Supporters on the terraces decided to call it a day and many left at half time.

Meanwhile in the dressing room, the Charlton manager Jimmy Trotter tried to rally his troops, urging his team to feed left winger Johnny Summers, Charlton's one potential source of danger in an otherwise lacklustre field. Sure enough, two minutes into the second half the tactics were rewarded as Summers broke through to make it 2-1.

But just four minutes later, Huddersfield swept into a 4-1 lead through Alex Bain's second goal and a Bill McGarry penalty.

This prompted a further trickle towards the exits, but the trickle turned into a stream when Bobby Ledger was left unmarked to slot home the visitors fifth just past the hour mark. 5-1 to Huddersfield.

With 28 minutes to play Charlton were a man short and four goals in arrears. The game was surely over. There seemed no way back.

THE COMEBACK

First, Summers centred for Johnny "Buck" Ryan to score - 5-2 - and then the winger instilled some real belief into the Valley by firing home his second and Charlton's third. 5-3 Huddersfield.

This time Charlton maintained their sudden momentum and Huddersfield inexplicably fell apart.

On 73 minutes Summers completed his hat trick. 5-4 Huddersfield.

Five minutes later The Addicks were level. Once more it was Summers. Unbelievably, 10 man Charlton had bought the match back from 5-1 down to 5-5.

By now the loss of their centre half hardly seeemed to matter as Charlton poured forward at will.

With nine minutes remaining the comeback was complete as Summers rammed home an astonishing fifth goal to put Charlton 6-5 in front.

But with four minutes remaining Stan Howard sent in a shot which deflected off John Hewie and beyond the wrong footed Willie Duff in the Charlton goal to even the match. 6-6 with four minutes to go.

The Charlton fans could have been forgiven for biting their nails and shrieking for the final whistle but they had become too caught up in the manic events of the last half hour.

With the clock ticking down the last few seconds Johnny Summers set off on one final burst, tearing clear of the hapless Tony Conwell yet again to send over a cross which Ryan met perfectly for Charlton to take the lead, again, with barely time left to start the whistle.

The final score: 7-6 to Charlton.

A more tragic fate awaited Johnny Summers, the hero of this hour, who would die from cancer within five years of this unforgettable afternoon.

Charlton Athletic: W.Duff, T.Edwards, D.Townsend, J.Hewie, D.Ufton, B.Kiernan, R.White, F.Lucas, J.Ryan, S.Leary, J.Summers.

Huddersfield Town: S.Kennon, T.Conwell, R.Wilson, K.Taylor, J.Connor, B.McGarry, B.Ledger, S.Howard, A.Bain, L.Massie, R.Simpson.

Farmville - An Echo Of Our Ancestry?

Media_httpphotoscakfb_cxtmp

It seems as though there may be something primordial lurking within Farmville that generates such mass appeal. We slave away at desks, in cities, or at libraries if we're students, and deep down long to just tend to our flock or nurse some vegetables in our allotment. Crucially, we like to show people what we've grown and let them know how happy we are doing it. This is what Facebook had to say about the trend:

Facebook has provided a platform for developers to create a number of hugely popular applications, and it is no surprise that users are talking about them. Rather surprisingly, the recent trend has been in farming related apps. It seems that with Facebook users spending more and more time online and less in the field, they need to channel their primal urges to farm somehow, and farming apps fill this need. Since its emergence in June 2009, Farmville became the most talked-about application in status updates and now boasts over 72 million monthly active users.

Update: A few people pointed out that applications post status updates and they claimed that this was the cause of the incredible growth of these apps. However, our analysis includes only status updates made through the status update box, mobile devices, and Twitter, not those made by applications.

What's Facebook's Favourite Sport?

Media_httpphotosgakfb_ectif

I'd love to see this for brands like Nike and Adidas, as the above doesn't really tell us that much about which sports Facebook users get excited about. This is what Facebook did say, though:

In February of 2009, the Steelers won the Super Bowl, and in October the Yankees won the World Series. Which did people talk about more? Well, the Steelers reached a higher peak value (6.0 / 1000 vs. 3.7 / 1000), but they only played one game. The Yankees were discussed a bit less per day, but over a longer period of time. So, are FB users more football or baseball fans? We don't want to start anything, so we'll just call it a tie.

Gaganomics

Media_httpphotosfakfb_abedq

Lady Gaga's meteoric rise to Stardom, and her prophet-like appeal among the 'little monsters' she calls her fans, is displayed here with the increase in Facebook status' that mentioned her name. The Facebook data team describe it as follows:

Lady Gaga was the biggest new performer of 2009. She was virtually unmentioned until November of 2008. The big spike in mentions of her name in September of 2009 corresponds to the MTV Video Music Awards in September, where she did well. At the end of September, Christopher Walken's performance of the song "Poker Face" caused a spike in that term, which didn't really impact occurrences of "Lady Gaga." Note that the two curves are on different scales, as "Lady Gaga" is mentioned much more frequently than her hit song "Poker Face".

Facebook | Facebook Data Team: Memology: The Top 15 Status Terms of 2009

The CMO's Guide To The Social Landscape

Media_httpwwwpennolso_cjxrs

Really like the way this is laid out. We see a lot of information, or infographics, about how many people are using social servies. Where they're from, how old they are, how often they log in, but all of this has limited use to marketers looking to tap into the resource for marketing communications.

The above helps navigate through the ocean of options.

CNBC's Most Influential Sports Tweeters of 2009

Wednesday, 30 Dec 2009 | 2:10 PM ET
Text Size
By: Darren Rovell
CNBC Sports Business Reporter

There's little doubt that Twitter has changed the world of sports reporting and sports fan interaction in 2009.  As we've cautioned with the other Twitter rankings we've released in the past, how many followers a person has is just one part of the equation in determining the most relevant tweeters in sports this year.

So, instead of putting it into a particular order, we are ranking the most relevant tweeters by category.

Athletes

Shaquille O'Neal (@THE_REAL_SHAQ): The Cleveland Cavaliers center has used Twitter to interact with his fans better than any other athlete. He has given away tickets and continues to answer tweets with great frequency. O'Neal has clearly earned his 2.7 million followers.

Stewart Cink (@stewartcink): Cink achieved greater relevancy through Twitter than any other athlete this year and while we're frankly a bit disappointed with the quality of his recent tweets, Cink's work on the social networking site after he won the British Open was commendable.

Lance Armstrong (@lancearmstrong): His courageous fight against cancer and the foundation he established has enabled Lance Armstrong to be in the conversation more than every summer during the Tour De France. But Armstrong's great use of Twitter extends his brand well. His work during this year's Tour truly made us feel like insiders.

Chad Ochocinco (@OGOchoCinco): There's nothing like a great trash talker on Twitter and Ochocinco is the tops. He loves posting goofy pictures, which his nearly 600,000 followers love.

Dwight Howard (@DwightHoward): Howard probably had the best athlete giveaway on Twitter, providing his one millionth follower with an all expenses paid trip to the Magic's home opener.

Journalists

Bill Simmons (@sportsguy33): ESPN's Simmons has proven that he can be just as effective in 140 characters or less as he can in his humungous ESPN columns. While tweets from Simmons take on a heavy basketball focus, it's his humorous tweets that get more pick up around the Twitterverse.

Adam Schefter (@Adam_Schefter): Schefter was switching from the NFL Network to ESPN just around the time it appeared like an ESPN edict would somewhat restrict Twitter use by its reporters. But that edict was overplayed and Schefter's managed to strike a balance by providing insightful commentary and still breaking news on ESPN.com and Twitter.

Pete Thamel (@PeteThamelNYT): This New York Times reporter has always been solid, but his work on the Urban Meyer situation towards the end of the year made him a must follow.

Miscellaneous

Mark Titus (@clubtrillion): We first discovered the blog of Mark Titus a couple years ago and interviewed him at the Final Four that year. Here's his deal. He rides the bench for Ohio State, but his comedic take on life is even better than his basketball game.

Evan Morgenstein (@sportsagentevan): If you are looking for the craziest man on Twitter, we've found him. There's literally no censoring this Olympic sports agent.

Eric Stangel (@EricStangel): Imagine if you had a chance to hear David Letterman tell jokes only about sports every night. Well, follow Stangel and you'll get what you dreamed of. Stangel is a huge sports fan and the head writer and executive producer of the Late Show.

Justin Gimelstob (@justingimelstob): This former pro tennis player has managed to pull in more than 7,000 followers thanks to his great sense of humor.

Pete Carroll (@petecarroll): Coaches flocked to Twitter this summer, but the USC head football coach is the leader in the clubhouse. He better watch his back though. Stanford coach Jim Harbaugh (@JimHarbaugh) is out to beat him in the Twitter game too.

Recent Sports Biz Stories

Questions?  Comments?  ");SportsBiz@cnbc.com');

© 2010 CNBC, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Definitely worth adding these guys to any sports twitter lists. Also - check out the stories of the last decade. Again - worth considering how this will match up over the next 10 years... and what role will social media play in helping us highlight them?

Very brief article from the Guardian outlining Manchester United's sponsorship operations

Bryan Glazer (L), Avram Glazer and Joel Glazer (R).

The Glazer family has helped to increase Manchester United's turnover in the last three financial years. Photograph: Martin Rickett/PA

Manchester United's turnover has increased from £210m to £279m in the three financial years since 2006-07. While much of that can be put down to increased ticket prices and bumper new Uefa and Premier League TV deals, it is true that commercial turnover has substantially increased – from £56m to £70m.

Representatives of the Glazers point out the role played by the club's satellite London office in boosting sponsorship revenues. A sales team, part of a 45-strong commercial operation at an office in Pall Mall, is responsible for identifying sponsorship categories and targeting global companies. They are the engine of the Glazers' plan to maximise United's global commercial potential. While the income brought in directly from Manchester United's much-trumpeted global fan base of 139 million "core fans" is relatively modest (£6.45m in 2008‑09), attempts aggressively to target overseas sponsors appear to be bearing fruit.

A new shirt deal with the US risk management company Aon will bring in £80m over four seasons, although £35.9m has already been banked upfront. The offer document reveals that total sponsorship from other sectors has almost doubled since the Glazers bought the club, from £11.8m to £19.5m.

It believes that Manchester United's global brand, digital opportunities and the changing media marketplace, will combine to realise "significant potential to expand this platform" by establishing a model similar to that successfully implemented by Uefa, Fifa and the IOC, where a range of sponsorship deals are sold on a local and global basis across eight to 10 categories.

Why Sponsorship Has Had Its Day - The Irish Times - Fri, Sep 04, 2009

Interesting article about sponsorship that I haven't had time to read yet!

WHEN BUSINESS magazines publish power lists, they’re fun to read but don’t carry much gravitas. Looked at over a period of time though, you can start to piece together who is well regarded and who was a “here today, gone tomorrow” type.

Tony Ponturo has been a feature of these lists for as long as sport appeared on the radar of business editors, marking the sudden growth in money flowing into the sector. Businessweek listed him one place above Philip Anshutz, founder of AEG, and just below LeBron James, the Tiger Woods of basketball. Forbes, likewise, routinely lists Ponturo in its top 10.

The source of Ponturo’s power is that for 25 years or so, he presided over the sports marketing budget of Anheuser-Busch, the number-one selling brewer in the US.

The company’s devotion to sport is shown by the fact that before its takeover by InBev in 2008, A-B’s sports marketing spend represented two-thirds of the company’s total marketing budget, with some estimates suggesting the Budweiser brand paid $378 million (€264 million) in sports marketing annually. When InBev moved in, Ponturo moved out, setting up his own New York-based consultancy. If anyone knows the pros and cons of “Official Partnership” it is Tony Ponturo, which makes his comments all the more surprising.

“Over the last few years we started to pick up something from our sponsorship research that said the consumer more than ever questioned the whole concept of Official Partnership,” says Ponturo. “There was a time when they felt that because a brand was the official mobile phone or the official beer of the league, that it said something special about you. But now they realise it was something that was purchased. It doesn’t mean you are the best or that the league or team values you: you were just the guy who ponied up the money”.

A brief glance at the commercial structure of every major governing body operating in today’s marketplace shows the official-partnership model is the blueprint for the industry, and as such is the cornerstone of the sports economy. It has been this way since Coca Cola bought the rights to the 1978 World Cup in Argentina, when Horst Dassler, heir of the Adidas empire, saw the benefits of selling sponsorship by market category, with each sponsor buying a carefully laid out set of rights that are exclusive to their business.

Event-based sponsorship accounts for over half of total spend in the sector and research by World Sponsorship Monitor/Sports Marketing Surveys shows rights fees commanded by elite events, such as the Olympics and World Cups, is outstripping the rest of the market.

“The power of big sports events will be there forever and they are becoming more, not less, important,” says Sir Martin Sorrell, chief executive of WPP. “There is a growing pool of money that wants them and a very limited number of sufficient quality and size. What companies are looking for are mass events that have a very strong appeal worldwide.”

To sponsors, the value of live events will increase as viewers’ habits change. “In a world where you can download anything, you can’t download live sport,” says Greg Dyke, former managing director of the BBC. “Anything live becomes more important. The price paid for it will continue to go up.”

The evidence from the sponsorship rights market supports this view. Fifa’s roster of top level partners is based on the principle of “less is more”. The structure for 2010 and 2014 reduces the number of top-tier World Cup sponsors from 15 to six. The enlarged product categories cost up to €200 million, dwarfing the average €40 million paid by Fifa’s sponsors for the 2006 World Cup in Germany.

In this way, sports sponsorship has been commoditised, enabling sports governing bodies such as the IOC, Fifa and GAA to offer brands a cleaner marketing environment, free of their competitors’ logos. That’s the theory anyway. Ponturo, however, says the package deals have led to a selling culture within sport that has affected its image to the detriment.

“I think that the way in which sponsorship has been sold historically has damaged its reputation as a marketing tool,” he says. “The last five years has seen the demand for sponsorship and its price rise dramatically. Money was plentiful all down the line. Sports properties kept raising the price and getting the money. That led to a laziness being built into the culture, and that has weakened the product. It also means the come down is even harder as the market dries up.”

The other implication of this selling mentality is that the leagues and clubs came across as greedy, he says. “They were saying that in order to keep moving forward they need more and more money. But their image is now out of tune with the times. Now the whole community of sport is getting a lesson in real economics.

“There has been little work done to help a brand use sport to form the basis of a marketing strategy, other than saying, ‘We want $30 million for the front of the shirt because . . . well, just because.’”

That approach, says Ponturo, simply doesn’t work anymore, but what replaces it is less clear. One trend is for brands to move from sponsoring events to creating and owning them outright. Red Bull are a good example of how this can work: with spectacular air shows that tie in with their “Red Bull Gives You Wings” strapline.

By doing this they remove the restrictions imposed on them by sports rights holders who govern precisely what they can and can’t do at the venue or in terms of media support. For the same reason, music festivals offer similar levels of flexibility and are growing in popularity as an alternative to sport.

This bespoke form of sponsorship is on the rise, as it offers a value for money alternative. Whether FIFA or the IOC are worried is another matter. Despite Tony Ponturo’s misgivings, the top of the sports market is still a big money game.

Budweiser and sport 

Beijing Olympics 2008: Budweiser was the official international beer sponsor of the games and of the national Olympic teams in 25 countries; Anheuser-Busch was the exclusive alcohol and non-alcohol, malt-based beverage of the telecast on NBC, Telemundo and cable properties.

American Football:
 Budweiser and Bud Light are the official beer sponsors of 28 NFL teams, and Budweiser is the official beer sponsor of the NFL in Canada; Anheuser-Busch holds exclusive alcohol beverage and non-alcohol, malt-based beverage sponsor rights for the Super Bowl telecast until 2012 and of the Bowl Championship Series until 2010.

Soccer: Budweiser and Bud Light are the official beer sponsors of Major League Soccer and its 13 teams; Budweiser is the official beer sponsor of the FIFA World Cup in South Africa in 2010 and in Brazil in 2014.

Baseball:
 Budweiser and Bud Light are the official beer sponsors of Major League Baseball and 26 teams; Budweiser is the official beer sponsor of Major League Baseball in Panama.

Golf:
 Michelob is the official sponsor of the PGA Tour and the Champions Tour, and golfer Sergio Garcia; Michelob Ultra is the official sponsor of the LPGA and golfers Lorie Kane, Grace Park and Natalie Gulbis.

Basketball: Bud Light is the official beer sponsor of the National Basketball Association and 26 teams; Budweiser is the official beer sponsor of the National Basketball Association in China, and Bud Light is the sponsor for that association in Mexico.

Hockey: Bud Light is the official beer sponsor of the National Hockey League and 21 US teams.

Horse racing:
 Budweiser Select is the official beer sponsor of Churchill Downs, the Kentucky Derby and Kentucky Oaks.

Nascar: Budweiser is the official beer sponsor of the Daytona International Speedway and the Daytona 500 and the exclusive telecast rights of the Daytona 500 until 2010 on Fox.